It is very common idea that the sequels to a some original movies are always inferior to the originals, but is it always the case maay be not?
Examples that are contrary to this generally accepted rule. Terminator II is very probably a better film than the original. Star Trek - the Wrath of Kahn generally accepted as better than Star Trek the movie. Star Wars - The empire strikes back is way better than Star Wars 1978. Godfather II is a better movie than The Godfather.
Are these examples just the rare exceptions that have no beaaring on the geneerally accepted rule. And is it wrong to include the SW and ST series in these comparisons? Allan Rosewarne
taraswizard
Plan C ezboard:
http://pub78.ezboard.com/bplanckittiensW/T forever, always
ahira's hangar
http://pub189.ezboard.com/bahirashangar<i></i>