| Ahira's Hangar https://ahirashangar.ihugny.com/phpBB3/ |
|
| Does Stephen R. Donaldson's vocabulary bother you? https://ahirashangar.ihugny.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=1986 |
Page 2 of 2 |
| Author: | Phantasm [ Sun Jul 11, 2010 10:56 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Does Stephen R. Donaldson's vocabulary bother you? |
Not really, I love learning new stuff, and dictionaries are great for just browsing through. |
|
| Author: | FarmUrTed [ Thu Nov 04, 2010 3:30 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Does Stephen R. Donaldson's vocabulary bother you? |
Word or typo? You be the judge: "Here in Andelain, the effects of that dire fug were muted." That's in AATE (not sure the page, but it's 17% of the way through according to BN Ereader). Is fug a word? Or did he make it up? Or is it just a typo (should've been fog)? Normally, I'd go with typo, but with Donaldson, you never know. |
|
| Author: | danlo [ Thu Nov 04, 2010 6:59 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Does Stephen R. Donaldson's vocabulary bother you? |
Merriam-Webster's definition of FUG : the stuffy atmosphere of a poorly ventilated space; also : a stuffy or malodorous emanation No I love his use of words, I looked them up all the time in the first two trilogies--though I think he uses pussiance and percipience, especially percipience way too much in the FR and AATE. It's almost like Bakker's use of "preternatural" in the Prince of Nothing books-I almost, almost got to the point of screaming... 
|
|
| Author: | Duchess of Malfi [ Thu Nov 04, 2010 7:41 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Does Stephen R. Donaldson's vocabulary bother you? |
The one I noticed him overusing in the three books of the last chrons is "formication". A word that sounds like it might have a fun meaning, but does not.  The only word that has ever truly bothered me was "roynish". When I first read the first chrons as a teenager, on-line dictionaries were not yet available. And the word was in no dictionary in the house or at my high school. To this day I have a mental vision of the ur-viles being tall and stately and royal looking because of that obscure word. 
|
|
| Author: | danlo [ Thu Nov 04, 2010 8:09 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Does Stephen R. Donaldson's vocabulary bother you? |
So far, up to p. 250 in AATE, formication doesn't bother me at all (believe me it did in the first 2 books). A lot of words seem to fit right into what's happening, so you can, somewhat, figure out what they're driving at. Oddly enough I never looked up roynish, back in the day, I was convinced it meant small, gnarly black things-so until 6 years ago I never really realized that ur-viles were as tall as they are... 
|
|
| Author: | FarmUrTed [ Sat Nov 06, 2010 3:04 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Does Stephen R. Donaldson's vocabulary bother you? |
Lol, thanks Danlo. I've only used the adverb form of 'fug' before. Didn't know you could use it as a noun. Now I'm seeing it every other page. |
|
| Author: | aliantha [ Mon Nov 08, 2010 7:09 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Does Stephen R. Donaldson's vocabulary bother you? |
I based a dictionary purchase, back in the day, on whether it had a definition for "roynish". I really like his use of unusual words.
|
|
| Page 2 of 2 | All times are UTC |
| Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|