Quote:Congress shall make no law respecting the establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; (the following is going to step on some toes and challenge a few sacred cows - pun)
The preceding is the "establishment" clause of the First Amendment. Due to historical circumstances many understand this clause to be solely for the protection of the individual rights to religious practice, and it does protect the individual's rights. (BTW, the freedom of an indvidual's practice of religious observance was not novel to the Framers) However, IMO, the framers of the bill of rights knew the greater power of this clause was the protection of government from organized religious interference. Now many might discount that statementing thinking what could government possibly fear from religious interference? But, acknowledging the recent hearing of a case by the Supreme Court, regarding the US Pledge of Allegiance, IMO the power of religion to interfere in government becomes apparent. BTW, a point of historical reference, the Pledge dates from around the years of WWI; however, the phrase "under god" was only added to the pledge shortly after WWII. So the Pledge was around for about thirty years before the phrase was added. taraswizard
Allan Rosewarne N9SQT/WDX6HQV
Chicago area
W/T forever, always
Plan C -
http://planc.bravepages.com/main.html<i></i>