Condalysa Rice? Well, I'm far from sure that if she gave a testimony or even made a public statement, all questions would be answered. If her statements agree with Dick (the attack dog) Cheney, then there will be questions about their absolute veracity, the responses will go like this "well, she was coached to agree with the current administration tack, that Mr. Clark was really out of the loop and not a player in the discussions, so can make no definitive or authoritative statements about what the official policy focus (Iraq or Al Qaeda domestic or foreign threats, or all) was." IOW, she has fallen on her own sword. If statements disagree with the Dick Cheney (consequently, they agree with Mr. Clark's more than not), well that really stirs the pot.
Lastly, not having her give a sworn statement to the 9/11 commission, really does make Cheney, Rumsfeild, Ashcroft, et. al., look like they're trying to cover something up. This is deja vu all over again. If there is nothing to hide, do not look like you're covering up.
Do I believe there's a cover up, do I even believe there's anything to cover up? Well, I do not know. taraswizard
Allan Rosewarne N9SQT/WDX6HQV
Chicago area
W/T forever, always
Plan C -
http://planc.bravepages.com/main.html<i></i>